Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

AutoML Tables is a service that allows you to automatically build and deploy state-of-the-art machine learning models on structured data without writing code. You can use AutoML Tables to perform the following steps for the classification task:

Exploratory data analysis: AutoML Tables provides a graphical user interface (GUI) and a command-line interface (CLI) to explore your data, visualize statistics, and identify potential issues.

Feature selection: AutoML Tables automatically selects the most relevant features for your model based on the data schema and the target column. You can also manually exclude or include features, or create new features from existing ones using feature engineering.

Model building: AutoML Tables automatically builds and evaluates multiple machine learning models using different algorithms and architectures. You can also specify the optimization objective, the budget, and the evaluation metric for your model.

Training and hyperparameter tuning: AutoML Tables automatically trains and tunes your model using the best practices and techniques from Google’s research and engineering teams. You can monitor the training progress and the performance of your model on the GUI or the CLI.

Serving: AutoML Tables automatically deploys your model to a fully managed, scalable, and secure environment. You can use the GUI or the CLI to request predictions from your model, either online (synchronously) or offline (asynchronously).

References:

[AutoML Tables documentation]

[AutoML Tables overview]

[AutoML Tables how-to guides]

 The tf.data dataset is a TensorFlow API that provides a way to create and manipulate data pipelines for machine learning. The tf.data dataset allows you to apply various transformations to the data, such as reading, shuffling, batching, prefetching, and interleaving. These transformations can affect the performance and efficiency of the model training process1

One of the common performance issues in model training is input-bound, which means that the model is waiting for the input data to be ready and is not fully utilizing the computational resources. Input-bound can be caused by slow data loading, insufficient parallelism, or large data size. Input-bound can be detected by using the Cloud TPU profiler plugin, which is a tool that helps you analyze the performance of your model on Cloud TPUs. The Cloud TPU profiler plugin can show you the percentage of time that the TPU cores are idle, which indicates input-bound2

To reduce the input-bound bottleneck and speed up the model training process, you can make some modifications to the tf.data dataset. Two of the modifications that can help are:

Use the interleave option for reading data. The interleave option allows you to read data from multiple files in parallel and interleave their records. This can improve the data loading speed and reduce the idle time of the TPU cores. The interleave option can be applied by using the tf.data.Dataset.interleave method, which takes a function that returns a dataset for each input element, and a number of parallel calls3

Set the prefetch option equal to the training batch size. The prefetch option allows you to prefetch the next batch of data while the current batch is being processed by the model. This can reduce the latency between batches and improve the throughput of the model training. The prefetch option can be applied by using the tf.data.Dataset.prefetch method, which takes a buffer size argument. The buffer size should be equal to the training batch size, which is the number of examples per batch4

The other options are not effective or counterproductive. Reducing the value of the repeat parameter will reduce the number of epochs, which is the number of times the model sees the entire dataset. This can affect the model’s accuracy and convergence. Increasing the buffer size for the shuffle option will increase the randomness of the data, but also increase the memory usage and the data loading time. Decreasing the batch size argument in your transformation will reduce the number of examples per batch, which can affect the model’s stability and performance.

References: 1: tf.data: Build TensorFlow input pipelines 2: Cloud TPU Tools in TensorBoard 3: tf.data.Dataset.interleave 4: tf.data.Dataset.prefetch : [Better performance with the tf.data API]

The option C is the most efficient and scalable solution for deploying a machine learning workflow with multiple models while ensuring version control and minimizing compute resource utilization. By exposing each model as an endpoint in Vertex AI Endpoints, it allows for easy versioning and management of individual models. Using Cloud Run to orchestrate the workflow ensures that the application can scale down to zero, thus minimizing resource utilization when not in use. Cloud Run is a service that allows you to run stateless containers on a fully managed environment or on Google Kubernetes Engine. You can use Cloud Run to invoke the endpoints of each model in the workflow and pass the data between them. You can also use Cloud Run to handle the input and output of the workflow and provide an HTTP interface for the application. References:

Vertex AI Endpoints documentation

Cloud Run documentation

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

The best option for handling missing values in a categorical feature is to replace them with a placeholder category indicating a missing value. This is a type of imputation, which is a method of estimating the missing values based on the observed data. Imputing the missing values with a placeholder category preserves the information that the data is missing, and avoids introducing bias or distortion in the feature distribution. It also allows the machine learning model to learn from the missingness pattern, and potentially use it as a predictor for the target variable. The other options are not suitable for handling missing values in a categorical feature, because:

Removing the rows with missing values and upsampling the dataset by 5% would reduce the size of the dataset and potentially lose important information. It would also introduce sampling bias and overfitting, as the upsampling process would create duplicate or synthetic observations that do not reflect the true population.

Replacing the missing values with the feature’s mean would not make sense for a categorical feature, as the mean is a numerical measure that does not capture the mode or frequency of the categories. It would also create a new category that does not exist in the original data, and might confuse the machine learning model.

Moving the rows with missing values to the validation dataset would compromise the validity and reliability of the model evaluation, as the validation dataset would not be representative of the test or production data. It would also reduce the amount of data available for training the model, and might introduce leakage or inconsistency between the training and validation datasets. References:

Imputation of missing values

Effective Strategies to Handle Missing Values in Data Analysis

How to Handle Missing Values of Categorical Variables?

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Z-score normalization is a technique that transforms the values of a numeric variable into standardized units, such that the mean is zero and the standard deviation is one. Z-score normalization can help to compare variables with different scales and ranges, and to reduce the effect of outliers and skewness. The formula for z-score normalization is:

z = (x - mu) / sigma

where x is the original value, mu is the mean of the variable, and sigma is the standard deviation of the variable.

Dataflow is a service that allows you to create and run data processing pipelines on Google Cloud. You can use Dataflow to preprocess raw data prior to model training and prediction, such as applying z-score normalization on data stored in BigQuery. However, using Dataflow for this task may not be the most efficient option, as it involves reading and writing data from and to BigQuery, which can be time-consuming and costly. Moreover, using Dataflow requires manual intervention to update the pipeline whenever new training data is added.

A more efficient way to perform z-score normalization on data stored in BigQuery is to translate the normalization algorithm into SQL and use it with BigQuery. BigQuery is a service that allows you to analyze large-scale and complex data using SQL queries. You can use BigQuery to perform z-score normalization on your data using SQL functions such as AVG(), STDDEV_POP(), and OVER(). For example, the following SQL query can normalize the values of a column called temperature in a table called weather:

SELECT (temperature - AVG(temperature) OVER ()) / STDDEV_POP(temperature) OVER () AS normalized_temperature FROM weather;

By using SQL to perform z-score normalization on BigQuery, you can make the process more efficient by minimizing computation time and manual intervention. You can also leverage the scalability and performance of BigQuery to handle large and complex datasets. Therefore, translating the normalization algorithm into SQL for use with BigQuery is the best option for this use case.

The best hardware to choose for your model while minimizing cost is a Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks instance running on an n1-standard-16 with a preemptible v3-8 TPU. This hardware configuration can provide you with high performance, scalability, and efficiency for your TensorFlow model, as well as low cost and flexibility for your long-running and checkpointing process. The v3-8 TPU is a cloud tensor processing unit (TPU) device, which is a custom ASIC chip designed by Google to accelerate ML workloads. It can handle large and complex models and datasets, and offer fast and stable training and inference. The n1-standard-16 is a general-purpose VM that can support the CPU and memory requirements of your model, as well as the data preprocessing and postprocessing tasks. By choosing a preemptible v3-8 TPU, you can take advantage of the lower price and availability of the TPU devices, as long as you can tolerate the possibility of the device being reclaimed by Google at any time. However, since you have built frequent checkpointing into your training process, you can resume your model from the last saved state, and avoid losing any progress or data. Moreover, you can use the Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks to create and manage your notebooks instances, and leverage the integration with Vertex AI and other Google Cloud services.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. A Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks instance running on an n1-standard-16 with 4 NVIDIA P100 GPUs is not a good option, as it has higher cost and lower performance than the v3-8 TPU. The NVIDIA P100 GPUs are the previous generation of GPUs from NVIDIA, which have lower performance, scalability, and efficiency than the latest NVIDIA A100 GPUs or the TPUs. They also have higher price and lower availability than the preemptible TPUs, which can increase the cost and complexity of your solution.

B. A Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks instance running on an n1-standard-16 with an NVIDIA P100 GPU is not a good option, as it has higher cost and lower performance than the v3-8 TPU. It also has less GPU memory and compute power than the option with 4 NVIDIA P100 GPUs, which can limit the size and complexity of your model, and affect the training and inference speed and quality.

C. A Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks instance running on an n1-standard-16 with a non-preemptible v3-8 TPU is not a good option, as it has higher cost and lower flexibility than the preemptible v3-8 TPU. The non-preemptible v3-8 TPU has the same performance, scalability, and efficiency as the preemptible v3-8 TPU, but it has higher price and lower availability, as it is reserved for your exclusive use. Moreover, since your model is long-running and checkpointing, you do not need the guarantee of the device not being reclaimed by Google, and you can benefit from the lower cost and higher availability of the preemptible v3-8 TPU.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Cloud TPU

Vertex AI Workbench user-managed notebooks

Preemptible VMs

NVIDIA Tesla P100 GPU

 The best option for automating the model retraining workflow is to use GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. GitHub Actions is a service that can create and run workflows for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) on GitHub. GitHub Actions can run tests, build and deploy code, and trigger other actions based on events such as code changes, pull requests, or manual triggers. Cloud Build is a service that can create and run scalable and reliable pipelines to build, test, and deploy software on Google Cloud. Cloud Build can build custom Docker images, push the images to Artifact Registry, and launch the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines. Vertex AI Pipelines is a service that can orchestrate machine learning (ML) workflows using Vertex AI. Vertex AI Pipelines can run preprocessing and training steps on custom Docker images, and evaluate, deploy, and monitor the ML model. By using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build, users can leverage the power and flexibility of Google Cloud to automate the model retraining workflow, while minimizing the steps required to build the workflow.

The other options are not as good as option D, for the following reasons:

Option A: Triggering a Cloud Build workflow to run tests, build custom Docker images, push the images to Artifact Registry, and launch the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines would require more configuration and maintenance than using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. Cloud Build is a service that can create and run pipelines to build, test, and deploy software on Google Cloud, but it is not designed to integrate with GitHub or other source code repositories. To trigger a Cloud Build workflow from GitHub, users would need to set up a webhook, a Cloud Pub/Sub topic, and a Cloud Function1. Moreover, Cloud Build does not support manual triggers, which limits the flexibility of the workflow2.

Option B: Triggering GitHub Actions to run the tests, launching a job on Cloud Run to build custom Docker images, pushing the images to Artifact Registry, and launching the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines would require more steps and resources than using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. Cloud Run is a service that can run stateless containers on a fully managed environment or on Anthos. Cloud Run can build custom Docker images, but it is not optimized for this task. Users would need to write a Dockerfile, a cloudbuild.yaml file, and a Cloud Run service configuration file, and use the gcloud command-line tool to build and deploy the image3. Moreover, Cloud Run is designed for serving HTTP requests, not for running ML pipelines, which can have different performance and scalability requirements.

Option C: Triggering GitHub Actions to run the tests, building custom Docker images, pushing the images to Artifact Registry, and launching the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines would require more skills and tools than using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. GitHub Actions can run tests and build code, but it is not specialized for building Docker images. Users would need to install and configure Docker on the GitHub Actions runner, write a Dockerfile, and use the docker command-line tool to build and push the image. Moreover, GitHub Actions has limitations on the disk space, memory, and CPU of the runner, which can affect the speed and reliability of the image building process.

References:

Building CI/CD for Vertex AI pipelines: The first solution

Cloud Build

GitHub Actions

Vertex AI Pipelines

Triggering builds from GitHub

Triggering builds manually

Building containers

Cloud Run

[Building and testing Docker images with GitHub Actions]

[Usage limits, billing, and administration]

Option A is incorrect because Cloud SQL is a relational database service that is not designed for storing and comparing model performance statistics. It would require writing complex SQL queries to perform the comparison, and it would not provide any visualization or analysis tools.

Option B is incorrect because Vertex AI does not support creating versions of models for each season per year. Vertex AI models are versioned based on the training data and hyperparameters, not on external factors such as seasonality or holidays. Moreover, the Evaluate tab of the Vertex AI UI only shows the performance metrics of a single model version, not across multiple versions.

Option C is incorrect because Kubeflow is a different platform than Vertex AI, and it does not integrate well with Vertex AI Pipelines. Kubeflow experiments are used to group pipeline runs that share a common goal or objective, not to compare performance statistics across different seasons or years. Kubeflow UI does not provide any tools to compare the results across the experiments, and it would require switching between different platforms to access the data.

Option D is correct because Vertex ML Metadata is a service that allows storing and tracking metadata associated with machine learning workflows, such as models, datasets, metrics, and events. Events are user-defined labels that can be used to group or slice the metadata for analysis. By using seasons and years as events, you can easily store and compare the performance statistics of each version of your models across different time periods. Vertex ML Metadata also provides tools to visualize and analyze the metadata, such as the ML Metadata Explorer and the What-If Tool.