Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

The best option for handling missing data in this case is to predict the missing values using linear regression. Linear regression is a supervised learning technique that can be used to estimate the relationship between a continuous target variable and one or more predictor variables. In this case, the target variable is the distance from the closest school, and the predictor variables are the other features in the dataset, such as house size, location, number of rooms, etc. By fitting a linear regression model on the data that has no missing values, we can then use the model to predict the missing values for the distance from the closest school feature. This way, we can preserve all the instances in the dataset and avoid introducing bias or reducing variance. The other options are not suitable for handling missing data in this case, because:

Deleting the rows that have missing values would reduce the size of the dataset and potentially lose important information. Since every instance is important, we want to keep as much data as possible.

Applying feature crossing with another column that does not have missing values would create a new feature that combines the values of two existing features. This might increase the complexity of the model and introduce noise or multicollinearity. It would not solve the problem of missing values, as the new feature would still have missing values whenever the distance from the closest school feature is missing.

Replacing the missing values with zeros would distort the distribution of the feature and introduce bias. It would also imply that the houses with missing values are located at the same distance from the closest school, which is unlikely to be true. A zero value might also be outside the range of the feature, as the distance from the closest school is unlikely to be exactly zero for any house. References:

Linear Regression

Imputation of missing values

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

 The best option for continuing experimenting and iterating on your pipeline to improve model performance, using Cloud Build for CI/CD, and deploying new pipelines into production quickly and easily, is to set up a CI/CD pipeline that builds and tests your source code and then deploys built artifacts into a pre-production environment. After a successful pipeline run in the pre-production environment, deploy the pipeline to production. This option allows you to leverage the power and simplicity of Cloud Build to automate, monitor, and manage your pipeline development and deployment workflow. Cloud Build is a service that can create and run continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines on Google Cloud. Cloud Build can build your source code, run unit tests, and deploy built artifacts to various Google Cloud services, such as Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Endpoints, and Artifact Registry. A CI/CD pipeline is a workflow that can automate the process of building, testing, and deploying software. A CI/CD pipeline can help you improve the quality and reliability of your software, accelerate the development and delivery cycle, and reduce the manual effort and errors. A pre-production environment is an environment that can simulate the production environment, but is isolated from the real users and data. A pre-production environment can help you test and validate your software before deploying it to production, and catch any bugs or issues that may affect the user experience or the system performance. By setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds and tests your source code and then deploys built artifacts into a pre-production environment, you can ensure that your pipeline code is consistent and error-free, and that your pipeline artifacts are compatible and functional. After a successful pipeline run in the pre-production environment, you can deploy the pipeline to production, which is the environment where your software is accessible and usable by the real users and data. By deploying the pipeline to production after a successful pipeline run in the pre-production environment, you can minimize the chance that the new pipeline implementations will break in production, and ensure that your software meets the user expectations and requirements1.

The other options are not as good as option C, for the following reasons:

Option A: Setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds and tests your source code, and if the tests are successful, using the Google Cloud console to upload the built container to Artifact Registry and upload the compiled pipeline to Vertex AI Pipelines would not allow you to deploy new pipelines into production quickly and easily, and could increase the manual effort and errors. The Google Cloud console is a web-based user interface that can help you access and manage various Google Cloud services, such as Artifact Registry and Vertex AI Pipelines. Artifact Registry is a service that can store and manage your container images and other artifacts on Google Cloud. Artifact Registry can help you upload and organize your container images, and track the image versions and metadata. Vertex AI Pipelines is a service that can orchestrate machine learning workflows using Vertex AI. Vertex AI Pipelines can run preprocessing and training steps on custom Docker images, and evaluate, deploy, and monitor the machine learning model. However, setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds and tests your source code, and if the tests are successful, using the Google Cloud console to upload the built container to Artifact Registry and upload the compiled pipeline to Vertex AI Pipelines would not allow you to deploy new pipelines into production quickly and easily, and could increase the manual effort and errors. You would need to write code, create and run the CI/CD pipeline, use the Google Cloud console to upload the built container to Artifact Registry, and use the Google Cloud console to upload the compiled pipeline to Vertex AI Pipelines. Moreover, this option would not use a pre-production environment to test and validate your pipeline before deploying it to production, which could increase the chance that the new pipeline implementations will break in production1.

Option B: Setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds your source code and then deploys built artifacts into a pre-production environment, running unit tests in the pre-production environment, and if the tests are successful, deploying the pipeline to production would not allow you to test and validate your pipeline before deploying it to production, and could cause errors or poor performance. A unit test is a type of test that can verify the functionality and correctness of a small and isolated unit of code, such as a function or a class. A unit test can help you debug and improve your code quality, and catch any bugs or issues that may affect the code logic or output. However, setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds your source code and then deploys built artifacts into a pre-production environment, running unit tests in the pre-production environment, and if the tests are successful, deploying the pipeline to production would not allow you to test and validate your pipeline before deploying it to production, and could cause errors or poor performance. You would need to write code, create and run the CI/CD pipeline, deploy the built artifacts to the pre-production environment, run the unit tests in the pre-production environment, and deploy the pipeline to production. Moreover, this option would not run the pipeline in the pre-production environment, which could prevent you from testing and validating the pipeline functionality and compatibility, and catching any bugs or issues that may affect the pipeline workflow or output1.

Option D: Setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds and tests your source code and then deploys built artifacts into a pre-production environment, after a successful pipeline run in the pre-production environment, rebuilding the source code, and deploying the artifacts to production would not allow you to deploy new pipelines into production quickly and easily, and could increase the complexity and cost of the pipeline development and deployment. Rebuilding the source code is a process that can recompile and repackage the source code into executable artifacts, such as container images and pipeline files. Rebuilding the source code can help you incorporate any changes or updates that may have occurred in the source code, and ensure that the artifacts are consistent and up-to-date. However, setting up a CI/CD pipeline that builds and tests your source code and then deploys built artifacts into a pre-production environment, after a successful pipeline run in the pre-production environment, rebuilding the source code, and deploying the artifacts to production would not allow you to deploy new pipelines into production quickly and easily, and could increase the complexity and cost of the pipeline development and deployment. You would need to write code, create and run the CI/CD pipeline, deploy the built artifacts to the pre-production environment, run the pipeline in the pre-production environment, rebuild the source code, and deploy the artifacts to production. Moreover, this option would increase the pipeline development and deployment time, as rebuilding the source code can be a time-consuming and resource-intensive process1.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 3: MLOps

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production, 3.2 Automating ML workflows

Official Google Cloud Certified Professional Machine Learning Engineer Study Guide, Chapter 6: Production ML Systems, Section 6.4: Automating ML Workflows

Cloud Build

Vertex AI Pipelines

Artifact Registry

Pre-production environment

Option A is incorrect because converting each categorical value into an integer value is not a good way to encode categorical values with high cardinality. This method implies an ordinal relationship between the categories, which may not be true. For example, assigning the values 1, 2, and 3 to the categories “red”, “green”, and “blue” does not make sense, as there is no inherent order among these colors1.

Option B is correct because converting the categorical string data to one-hot hash buckets is a suitable way to encode categorical values with high cardinality. This method uses a hash function to map each category to a fixed-length vector of binary values, where only one element is 1 and the rest are 0. This method preserves the sparsity and independence of the categories, and reduces the dimensionality of the input space2.

Option C is incorrect because mapping the categorical variables into a vector of boolean values is not a valid way to encode categorical values with high cardinality. This method implies that each category can be represented by a combination of true/false values, which may not be possible for a large number of categories. For example, if there are 10,000 categories, then there are 2^10,000 possible combinations of boolean values, which is impractical to store and process3.

Option D is incorrect because converting each categorical value into a run-length encoded string is not a useful way to encode categorical values with high cardinality. This method compresses a string by replacing consecutive repeated characters with the character and the number of repetitions. For example, “AAAABBBCC” becomes “A4B3C2”. This method does not reduce the dimensionality of the input space, and does not preserve the semantic meaning of the categories4.

References:

Encoding categorical features

One-hot hash buckets

Boolean vector

Run-length encoding

Option A is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using profit as model output is not the best way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product. For example, the same product may have different profitability in different regions, depending on the climate, culture, or preferences of the customers. Moreover, this option does not account for the granularity of the location data, which may be too fine or too coarse for the model. For example, using the exact coordinates of a city may not be meaningful, as the profitability may vary within the city, or using the country name may not be informative, as the profitability may vary across the country.

Option B is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a suitable way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same drawbacks as option A, as it does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, or account for the granularity of the location data. Moreover, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest. Instead, it predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, such as the price, the cost, or the demand of the product. To obtain the profitability, we would need to subtract the expenses from the revenue, which may introduce errors or uncertainties in the prediction.

Option C is correct because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using profit as model output is a good way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product, by creating a feature cross of these two features. A feature cross is a synthetic feature that combines the values of two or more features into a single feature1. This option also accounts for the granularity of the location data, by binning the feature cross into discrete buckets. Binning is a technique that groups continuous values into intervals, which can reduce the noise and complexity of the data2. Moreover, this option directly predicts the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, by using it as the model output.

Option D is incorrect because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a valid way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same advantages as option C, as it captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, and accounts for the granularity of the location data, by creating a feature cross and binning it. However, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, but rather predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, as explained in option B.

References:

Feature cross

Binning

[Profitability]

[Revenue and expenses]

[Latitude and longitude]

[Product type]

Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. Cloud Build can import source code from Cloud Source Repositories, Cloud Storage, GitHub, or Bitbucket, execute a build to your specifications, and produce artifacts such as Docker containers or Java archives1

Cloud Build allows you to set up automated triggers that start a build when changes are pushed to a source code repository. You can configure triggers to filter the changes based on the branch, tag, or file path2

To automate the execution of unit tests for a Kubeflow Pipeline that require custom libraries, you can use Cloud Build to set an automated trigger to execute the unit tests when changes are pushed to your development branch in Cloud Source Repositories. You can specify the steps of the build in a YAML or JSON file, such as installing the custom libraries, running the unit tests, and reporting the results. You can also use Cloud Build to build and deploy the Kubeflow Pipeline components if the unit tests pass3

The other options are not recommended or feasible. Writing a script that sequentially performs the push to your development branch and executes the unit tests on Cloud Run is not a good practice, as it does not leverage the benefits of Cloud Build and its integration with Cloud Source Repositories. Setting up a Cloud Logging sink to a Pub/Sub topic that captures interactions with Cloud Source Repositories and using a Pub/Sub trigger for Cloud Run or Cloud Function to execute the unit tests is unnecessarily complex and inefficient, as it adds extra steps and latency to the process. Cloud Run and Cloud Function are also not designed for executing unit tests, as they have limitations on the memory, CPU, and execution time45

References: 1: Cloud Build overview 2: Creating and managing build triggers 3: Building and deploying Kubeflow Pipelines using Cloud Build 4: Cloud Run documentation 5: Cloud Functions documentation

According to the official exam guide1, one of the skills assessed in the exam is to “automate and orchestrate ML pipelines using Cloud Composer”. Vertex AI Pipelines2 is a service that allows you to orchestrate your ML workflows using Kubeflow Pipelines SDK v2 or TensorFlow Extended. Vertex AI Pipelines supports execution caching, which means that if you run a pipeline and it reaches a component that has already been run with the same inputs and parameters, the component does not run again. Instead, the component uses the output from the previous run. This can save you time and resources when you are iterating on your pipeline. Therefore, option A is the best way to reduce model development costs, as it enables execution caching for the data export and preprocessing steps, which are likely to be the same for each model iteration. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Vertex AI Pipelines

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

TFRecords are a binary file format that can store large amounts of data efficiently. By converting the images to TFRecords and storing them in a Cloud Storage bucket, you can reduce the data size and improve the data transfer speed. You can then read the TFRecords by using the tf.data.TFRecordDataset function, which creates a dataset of tensors from the TFRecord files. This way, you can read images at scale during training while minimizing data I/O bottlenecks. References:

TFRecord documentation

tf.data.TFRecordDataset documentation

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

The best option to ensure that the features with the largest magnitude don’t overfit the model is to normalize the data by scaling it to have values between 0 and 1. This is also known as min-max scaling or feature scaling, and it can reduce the variance and skewness of the data, as well as improve the numerical stability and convergence of the model. Normalizing the data can also make the model less sensitive to the scale of the features, and more focused on the relative importance of each feature. Normalizing the data can be done using various methods, such as dividing each value by the maximum value, subtracting the minimum value and dividing by the range, or using the sklearn.preprocessing.MinMaxScaler function in Python.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. Standardizing the data by transforming it with a logarithmic function is not a good option, as it can distort the distribution and relationship of the data, and introduce bias and errors. Moreover, the logarithmic function is not defined for negative or zero values, which can limit its applicability and cause problems for the model.

B. Applying a principal component analysis (PCA) to minimize the effect of any particular feature is not a good option, as it can reduce the interpretability and explainability of the data and the model. PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique that transforms the data into a new set of orthogonal features that capture the most variance in the data. However, these new features are not directly related to the original features, and can lose some information and meaning in the process. Moreover, PCA can be computationally expensive and complex, and may not be necessary for the problem at hand.

C. Using a binning strategy to replace the magnitude of each feature with the appropriate bin number is not a good option, as it can lose the granularity and precision of the data, and introduce noise and outliers. Binning is a discretization technique that groups the continuous values of a feature into a finite number of bins or categories. However, this can reduce the variability and diversity of the data, and create artificial boundaries and gaps that may not reflect the true nature of the data. Moreover, binning can be arbitrary and subjective, and depend on the choice of the bin size and number.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Feature Scaling for Machine Learning: Understanding the Difference Between Normalization vs. Standardization

sklearn.preprocessing.MinMaxScaler documentation

Principal Component Analysis Explained Visually

Binning Data in Python