PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

nager should also help the stakeholders understand how the agile principles and practices affect the project’s reporting and metrics2. The project manager should explain that agile reporting focuses on delivering value, responding to change, and satisfying customer needs3. The project manager should also collaborate with the stakeholders to identify the most relevant and meaningful reports and KPIs for the agile project, such as velocity, burn-up or burn-down charts, sprint or product backlog, and customer feedback. References:

1: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 10.1.3.1

2: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.3

3: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.2

: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, section 1.2.4

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should assess the situation to understand how the organization’s culture impacts the decision-making process, and coach the team toward a new model. This is because the project manager is responsible for facilitating the team’s decision-making process and ensuring that it aligns with the agile principles and values1. The project manager should also consider the following factors that may affect the team’s decision-making process2:

The level of empowerment and autonomy given to the team by the organization and the stakeholders

The degree of collaboration and communication among the team members and with other parties

The availability and quality of information and data to support the decision-making process

The complexity and uncertainty of the project environment and the product requirements

The time and resource constraints and the impact of delays on the project outcomes

The potential risks and opportunities associated with the decisions and the alternatives

The feedback and learning mechanisms to evaluate and improve the decision-making process

The project manager should coach the team toward a new model of decision-making that is more agile and adaptive, such as the following3:

Decentralized decision-making: The team members are empowered to make decisions within their scope of work and authority, without waiting for approval from higher levels of management. This can increase the team’s speed, efficiency, and ownership of the decisions.

Collaborative decision-making: The team members work together to make decisions that benefit the project and the stakeholders, rather than competing or conflicting with each other. This can enhance the team’s creativity, innovation, and quality of the decisions.

Data-driven decision-making: The team members use empirical evidence and data to support their decisions, rather than relying on assumptions or opinions. This can improve the team’s accuracy, reliability, and transparency of the decisions.

Iterative decision-making: The team members make decisions in small increments and cycles, rather than in large batches and phases. This can allow the team to adapt to changing conditions and feedback, and to deliver value early and frequently.

Value-based decision-making: The team members make decisions that maximize the value delivered to the customer and the stakeholders, rather than focusing on the cost or the schedule. This can ensure the team’s alignment with the project vision and goals.

The project manager should mentor the team to explain agile principles and create a shared understanding. This will help the team to adopt an agile mindset, embrace the values and practices of agile approaches, and collaborate effectively throughout the project. The project manager should also provide feedback, coaching, and support to the team as they learn and apply agile methods. Evaluating the possibility of managing this project using a predictive approach, submitting a change request for a new team, and hiring a functional manager are not appropriate actions to address the situation, as they do not address the root cause of the confusion or help the team to develop agile competencies. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 27-28, 555-556; [Agile Practice Guide], pages 8-9, 13-14, 27-28; PMP Exam Content Outline, 2020, pages 6-7.

The agile project lead should have assessed the technical and organizational readiness for the project and identified risks at the beginning of the first iteration. This would have helped to ensure that the project scope, requirements, and deliverables were feasible, realistic, and aligned with the product vision and customer expectations. It would have also enabled the agile project lead to anticipate and mitigate any potential technical or organizational impediments that could affect the project execution and delivery. By performing this assessment and risk identification early in the project, the agile project lead could have avoided the situation where a team member discovered a technical gap midway through implementation that required rework and communication to all stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18; Agile Practice Guide, 2017, page 14; PMP Exam Content Outline, 2021, page 12.

In an agile team, autonomy is a key factor for motivation, innovation, and ownership. Autonomy means that the team can decide how to do their work, as long as they are aligned with the project vision and goals. The project manager should support the team’s request for more autonomy, as it will empower them to find creative solutions, overcome challenges, and deliver value to the customer. The project manager should not discourage the team or delegate the decision-making to the team lead, as it will undermine the team’s self-organization and collaboration1. References:

PMP Exam Content Outline

PMI PMP Q&A: What should project manager do if team ask for more autonomy1

The project manager should have kept documentation in the PMIS and shared it with appropriate stakeholders. The PMIS is an information system consisting of the tools and techniques used to gather, integrate, and disseminate the outputs of project management processes1. It is used to support all aspects of the project from initiating through closing, and can include both manual and automated systems1. By keeping documentation in the PMIS, the project manager can ensure that the project information is updated, consistent, accessible, and secure. The project manager can also use the PMIS to communicate and collaborate with the relevant stakeholders, such as the project team, the sponsor, the customer, and the auditors2.

Option A is not the best answer because reviewing the risk register to identify a response plan for the audit is a reactive and not a proactive way to handle documentation for the project. The project manager should have anticipated and planned for the audit as part of the project risk management process3.

Option B is not the best answer because assigning a project team member to ensure all project documentation was updated is not a sufficient or efficient way to handle documentation for the project. The project manager should have established a clear and consistent process for updating and maintaining the project documentation, and used the PMIS to facilitate and automate this process4.

Option C is not the best answer because updating the project management plan regularly and having it securely shared with all stakeholders is only a partial way to handle documentation for the project. The project management plan is a formal, approved document that defines how the project is executed, monitored, and controlled. It is an important part of the project documentation, but not the only one. The project manager should have also updated and shared other project documents, such as the project schedule, the project budget, the project status reports, and the project deliverables. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.1.3.2, Project Management Information System 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 10.1.3.3, Communication Methods, Models, and Channels 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.1.3.1, Risk Management Plan 4: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.4.3.1, Project Documents Updates : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.1.3.1, Project Management Plan : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.1.4.1, Project Documents

According to the PMBOK Guide, project managers should apply adaptive planning and agile practices to respond to changes and uncertainties in complex projects. Adaptive planning involves frequent reviews and adjustments of the project scope, schedule, cost, and quality based on the feedback and learning from the project execution. Agile practices emphasize delivering value to the customer by prioritizing the most important features and requirements and delivering them in increments1.

In this scenario, the project manager faces a situation where one feature cannot be fixed before the go-live date, which impacts the project schedule and quality. The project manager should apply adaptive planning and agile practices to determine the best course of action. The project manager should evaluate the value and importance of the feature to the customer and the project objectives. If the feature is not critical or essential, the project manager should consider delivering the project without the feature and fixing the defects later, after the go-live milestone. This way, the project can still deliver value to the customer and meet the expectations of the stakeholders. The project manager should communicate this decision to the customer and the stakeholders and obtain their agreement and feedback1.

The other options are not as suitable as option D. Option A involves updating the risk management plan and including additional mitigation actions against the feature defects. However, this option does not address the impact on the go-live milestone or the customer value. It also assumes that the feature defects can be mitigated, which contradicts the premise of the question. Option B involves assessing the relevance of the feature and submitting a change request to descope it. However, this option does not consider the customer value or the feedback from the customer and the stakeholders. It also implies that the feature is not important or valuable, which may not be the case. Option C involves improving the control quality process by implementing additional testing to minimize the defects before the go-live milestone. However, this option does not acknowledge the fact that there is no way to resolve the defects before the go-live date, as stated in the question. It also does not consider the impact on the project schedule and cost, or the customer value1.

According to the PBA Guide, retrospectives are a technique to review the project performance and identify lessons learned, best practices, and improvement opportunities1. Retrospectives are especially useful in agile projects, where they are conducted at the end of each iteration or sprint2. By implementing retrospectives with the vendor, the project manager can ensure that the project team and the vendor share the same understanding of the project goals, requirements, and deliverables. The project manager can also facilitate knowledge transfer and collaboration between the team and the vendor, and address any issues or risks that may affect the project continuity. References: 1: PBA Guide, page 154 2: PMBOK Guide, page 188